In This Essay Is Trying to Study The Relation Between Islam and DEMOCRACY In Model of Deep DEMOCRACY and COMMITTED DEMOCRACY. Thus, I Study This Relation in on Seven Factors of Concepts of DEMOCRACY (Political or Philosophical), Awareness From outside, Multi Approach to DEMOCRACY, Community nd Self Interaction, Communication, Situated Self and Pluralism, That Are Beyond of Current Liberal DEMOCRACY in The West, and Criticize It. This Factors Are Basis of Deep DEMOCRACY. And, Because COMMITTED DEMOCRACY Is Taking From Shariati, s Thought, Then This DEMOCRACY Relyed on Shariati, s Thought. Finally, Is Resulted That, Shariati, s Reading on Islam, in This Sight, Is Democratic.

Background and aim: The correct patient identification is a key step in performing Safe therapeutic procedures for patients and Nurses’ professional commitment has an important impact on improving patient care. This study examines the Relationship between Nurses professional commitment and patient Misidentification.Methods: This is a cross-sectional, correlational study. Through a stratified sampling method, 300 nurses were selected. Data were collected by a three-part questionnaire consisted of demographic data, Misidentification and Nurses Professional Commitment questionnaire.Data were analyzed on SPSS software version 16 using descriptive and statistics and Pearson's correlation coefficient.Findings: The participants were between 22-50 years old and the majority of them was women (86.7%) and married (64%). The mean score for Patient Misidentification was 9 (Low) for each nurses in past 3 months and it was 86 (COMMITTED) for Nurses Professional Commitment and there was significant relationship between Patient Misidentification and Nurses Professional Commitment (p<0.049).Conclusion: The incidence of patient Misidentification by COMMITTED Nurses indicates on Inevitability of the error. Therefore, making strategies to reporting errors and get help from other members of the care team can help in preventing and reducing errors.

There are two general views on the impact of technology on DEMOCRACY: a (technology is a threat to DEMOCRACY, b) technology provides proper grounds for DEMOCRACY.The aim of this article is to study the consequences of the influence of technology on DEMOCRACY. Taking technologistic and cultural approaches, this paper studies the influence of technology on the four components of DEMOCRACY as a government system- decision making policy, human beings as decision makers, community as consisting of individuals, and procedures of determining destiny-and argues that technology is an integral part of DEMOCRACY in modern technological era to the extent that it entails making the new term as «technological DEMOCRACY. This term overshadows the question of whether technology is a threat or opportunity to DEMOCRACY. The question would be significant, when its purpose is to reconcile DEMOCRACY and technology.

The present study was conducted with the aim of identifying the types of crimes in the context of the dark web and also the effective dimensions of the dark web in the spread of crime. Anonymity around dark web paves the way for illegal activities. Accessing this web requires particular methods and unexpected contents are usually exchanged on it. This content is in most cases illegal and immoral, and the reason for calling this section dark originated from there. The findings also show that the rapid growth of technology has posed a significant threat and challenge to cyberspace around the world. Access to woodpecker networks is not easy, but everything is traded; From counterfeit drugs and currency to human organs and even murderers! The important point about the dark web network is what can be bought or sold on these networks: Anything that you can not easily access in the normal world can be bought on these networks. These crimes have spread to some extent because the technical knowledge of criminals has also become more advanced. This research is intended, with a practical approach and qualitative method and using tools such as documentary studies, libraries and review of records, analytical review of news, interviews with experts and content analysis, to firstly provide general definitions of specialized and widely used terms, how to form dark web and its characteristics and then introduce all kinds of crimes COMMITTED in the dark web platform, markets and famous sites in this platform, illegal and criminal goods and services provided in this field and techniques for finding criminals in the deep web, as well.

Religious DEMOCRACY model possesses significant critical capacity in comparison to other theoretical patterns of political system. Inspired by the teachings of new critical theory and explaining critical capacity of the model of deliberative DEMOCRACY order as a product of new critical theory, the author explains theoretical proximity and coordination found between deliberative DEMOCRACY order and religious DEMOCRACY model. Then he argues for the critical capacity of religious DEMOCRACY and its higher capacity as compared to deliberative DEMOCRACY order. This paper is mainly intended to shed a light on the idea of necessity of religious DEMOCRACY for Muslim nations in the existing conditions of the Muslim World.

In recent modernity era, especially between big war and the annihilation of communism, the most important political division in democratic countries has been the duality of Right/Left. Often the two biggest rival parties, apart from their different names, have been representing two tendencies, the social DEMOCRACY and the liberal DEMOCRACY. The main difference between these two positions has been about functionality and ethicality of welfare state. Our question in this article is the following: From the point view of social and economic mechanism, the intersection of democratic countries is closer to system of preferences of social DEMOCRACY or liberal DEMOCRACY? It is to corroboration that, somewhat contrary to the twentieth century, a scientific-experimental and realistic approach to the social planning makes these two positions convergent in a pragmatist framework, and, despite of a propagandist atmosphere of challenge, their theoretical and ideological differences are leaving their seriousness and functionality. The conflict of Tax versus services is transferring from an ideological and ethical principle to a subject for a limited and temporary examination among a group of experts. The existence of welfare state is no more a problem, it is its ranges and limitations which is a subject of discussion and decision. Even the domain of disagreement here is to reduce.

The deconstructionist philosophy is a good example to show how systematic philosophy corresponds with DEMOCRACY. Through criticizing egocentrism and enmity to others, deconstructionism is after relating the philosophical principles with the principle of acceptance of others and DEMOCRACY. On the other hand Derrida' s discussion of socio-political DEMOCRACY like DEMOCRACY of the future and the challenges DEMOCRACY faces, also have its roots in his philosophical thinking. So DEMOCRACY and deconstructionism are two sides of the same coin and it is not possible to understand one without understanding the other. This is a strong relation and Derrida's idea about philosophy and politics is based on it. The DEMOCRACY of future as the result of this relation is the mirror of Derridean philosophy and politics. The relation between philosophy and deconstructionist DEMOCRACY and their interaction and effects on each other are among the main concerns of this paper.